Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Radicalsubversiv
I'm not going to bother offering a formal response to this obvious abuse of the RFC process unless it's certified. No one besides Libertas has raised concerns about any of my supposedly nefarious edits that she lists here. Anyone concerned with my behavior is encouraged to contact me privately -- I'll be happy to respond. RadicalSubversiv E 06:50, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Your partisan editing, corruption of Wikipedia for private purpose, trolling and personal abuse are all going to be exposed here. You initiated this process through your RFC, not me. You encouraged me many times to take you to arbitration rather than cease and desist your abuse. Time has come for some accountability I think. Libertas
- In that case, I suggest you make your RfC page at least as comprehensive as the one created by Radicalsubversiv -- Carnildo 07:25, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
I am, I definitely am. His edits go over a long time frame so I am working it through, the page is not finished and is very much a draft. It will be a damning indictment of a troll out of control. Libertas
wilful pattern of self abuse—for some reason I don't think RfC was really intended to deal with this sort of thing. :-) —Charles P. (Mirv) 08:17, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Urr... this page is rediculous.--Che y Marijuana 11:55, Jan 8, 2005 (UTC)
What's ridiculous is Radical subversive's political associates desperately trying to cover up his self abuse. It's time it was fully peer reviewed, and this is the appropriate forum. User:Libertas Patriot
- You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. --fvw* 00:44, 2005 Jan 9 (UTC)
I'm okay with the article not being deleted in the interests of keeping a record, but I'd very appreciative if someone would remove it from WP:RFC -- where there's a full paragraph of pretty nasty attacks -- now that it's far beyond the 48-hour notification period. RadicalSubversiv E 08:56, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)