Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elbert bill

Elbert bill

Elbert bill was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete.

Some IP number wrote an article whose entire content was "This bill is about the governal [sic] general of India under the British Govenment [sic]." Fvw then slapped substub and clearup thingies on it. I contend that any "article" of this degree of uninformativeness and general sloth deserves to be speedied by any administrator; if not, then we'll have trolls writing articles like "bill griffith rites wierd stuff in my newspaper" just for the pleasure of watching others wasting time over it. -- Hoary 09:41, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• delete. I totaly agree with you. I mark such pages as {{db|no content}}.
• Delete. A brief Google Search failed to come with anything of interest. Also, would be called an act not a bill if passed by the Parliament. Capitalistroadster 10:28, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Yeah ok, on second thought I suppose it is pretty weak. Delete --fvw* 15:43, 2004 Dec 13 (UTC)
• Delete: Seems pretty much category #4, but I'm vicious about that kind of thing. Unverifiable and, apparently, not notable. Geogre 19:22, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Speedy, no context, stub. Wyss 12:26, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.