User talk:Our Phellap

Links to archived discussions[edit]

British Rail Class 37 37025[edit]

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article British Rail Class 37 37025, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at Talk:British Rail Class 37 37025. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 03:35, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Map of the Chase Line.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Map of the Chase Line.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 20:11, 17 December 2006 (UTC) Note: The nomination was done on Dec 15th[reply]

London Underground 1938 Stock[edit]

Thank you for cleaning the image problem with the London Underground 1938 Stock page. I tried for some time to fix the problem but couldn't figure it out, couldn't find the error. Jsp3970 02:13, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On the move again[edit]

I have put WP:RM foe London to Ashford to Dover Line --> South Eastern Main Line. Simply south 19:36, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:Hertage railway stations in Wiltshire[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Hertage railway stations in Wiltshire, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Hertage railway stations in Wiltshire has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Hertage railway stations in Wiltshire, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 19:30, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:LMS Princess Coronation Class[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:LMS Princess Coronation Class requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{tranclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:British Rail AC electric[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:British Rail AC electric requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:39, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:British Rail Type 1[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:British Rail Type 1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:39, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:British Rail Type 2[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:British Rail Type 2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:39, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:British Rail Type 3[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:British Rail Type 3 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:39, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:British Rail Class 37[edit]

I have nominated Category:British Rail Class 37 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. BG 7 00:27, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:British Rail Class 66[edit]

File:165119_at_Didcot_Parkway.JP[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:165119_at_Didcot_Parkway.JPG

Something appears to be off with the attribution, you may want to look at it.--The Navigators (talk)-May British Rail Rest in Peace. 05:26, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:87001 at Crewe Works.JPG[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:87001 at Crewe Works.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:35, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Start Sheffield Supertram box[edit]

Template:Start Sheffield Supertram box has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DH85868993 (talk) 07:16, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Treforest Estate railway station[edit]

Hi, since you were involved in a previous move of Trefforest Estate railway station, please comment at Talk:Treforest Estate railway station#Wrong title. --Redrose64 (talk) 12:42, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Operation Perseus for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Operation Perseus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Perseus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nordic Dragon 09:18, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please claim your upload(s): File:456010 at London Charing Cross.jpg[edit]

Hi, Thank you, for uploading this file.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm some details,

If it's your own work, please include {{own}}, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant. You can also add |claimed=yes to the {{media by uploader}} tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

If it's not your own work please provide as much sourcing/authorship information as you are able to.

This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transfered to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:20, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Start Midland Metro box[edit]

Template:Start Midland Metro box has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 20:07, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Riley and Son for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Riley and Son is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riley and Son until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nordic Nightfury 13:05, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Current UK TOCs[edit]

Template:Current UK TOCs has been nominated for merging with Template:Defunct UK TOCs. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Cnbrb (talk) 11:29, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Isle of Man[edit]

Portal:Isle of Man, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Isle of Man (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Isle of Man during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:04, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of British Rail Class 960 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article British Rail Class 960, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Rail Class 960 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.