Talk:Treaty 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hayley.browning. Peer reviewers: JCMN.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 11:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect Link[edit]

The link to the Whitefishlake First Nation under the heading "Alberta First Nations" is linked to the article regarding the Whitefish Lake Band from Ontario -- which is incorrect. 68.145.96.226 (talk) 23:16, 1 November 2010 (UTC)SWC[reply]



Untitled[edit]

referenced at http://www.rrc.mb.ca/library/guides/2beau02.htm :

Ottawa: Queen's Printer, 1964. 32 p.
Call Number: R33 0664/ 1964


Stub Status[edit]

How much bigger would this artical have to be to lose stub status? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Royalguard11 (talkcontribs)

I think it's fair to remove the stub status on the article, so I've done so. —GrantNeufeld 06:47, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I won't put it back on but I suppose someone might at some point; there's not much "First Nations content" here and no mention of the treaty's impact, nor of the latter-day Treaty 6 organization, and more; exactly how much more content it needs I don't know, but certainly a MAP (duh) and a listing of the governments/bands, the importance of the treaty area in contrast to the untreated rest of the province (BC) and so on. Oh, what the hell, I'll put the NorthAm-native-stub on here; standards are evolving in the Indigenous Peoples of North America as to what such articles can contain; and I can tell you from a look here that it IS a stub, by project standards.Skookum1 17:42, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Treaty 6. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:15, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Hello,

I think that this article is a little rough around the edges but has a lot of good information to work with. Some of the phrasing in the lead section of the article is a little awkward and could be edited for clarity. Also, a lot of the pre-existing information in the article is lacking good references and therefore could be edited and added to. Another thing that could use some editing is the organization of the article; it may be a good idea to add some new sections and to move some information around within the article. JCMN (talk) 01:30, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Language X has no concept of Y[edit]

Regarding 'there is no concept of "land ownership" or "cede", which follows from the concept of land ownership, in the Cree language' - The notion of "language X has no concept of Y" is a myth. Anything expressible in one human language can be expressed in all human languages. I think there is valuable point to make in this paragraph, but the current wording is problematic and inaccurate. Indefatigable (talk) 01:53, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]