Talk:Fraser Papers

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

From VfD:

Just an advertisement and a link to a company website.—Rory ☺ 17:13, Aug 26, 2004 (UTC)

This company is part of the Canadaian S&P/TSX index (formerly TSE 300). I am attempting to add all the companies on that index. I was using categories instead of a list. If it is more appropriate to make a list then I apologize and please let me know. --YUL89YYZ 18:34, Aug 26, 2004 (UTC)

To clarify: I couldn't tell if this company was notable so I decided to list it here and see what other Wikipedians think. The best thing you can do is to make it clear (here or, better, in the article) what makes this company notable. Is it particularly big or old? Does it hit the news regularly? Is it known to people who aren't local or in the industry? When I listed this it was basically just a link, so I couldn't judge.—Rory ☺ 18:55, Aug 26, 2004 (UTC)

Keep: As written now, it establishes the company as a major commercial concern and a significant presence in the world. Geogre 02:35, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Keep. I've added several facts that I think make it notable, and am working with the newcomer to try and avoid such misunderstandings in the future. It is a publicly traded company, which, in my mind is notable enuf, but it is also on what seems to be the equivalent of the Dow Jones Industrial Average, plus has some 'firsts' within its industry. Niteowlneils 14:58, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)

I'm not sure on the policy here. I'm convinced of it's place now that the article has been expanded. Can I simply remove the listing or does it have to stay here all week? Is it enough to just remove the {{vfd}} tag?—Rory ☺ 18:37, Aug 27, 2004 (UTC)

- There are cases of "early removal," but those have to be kind of exaggerated cases (someone nominating George Washington or something. Just remove the VfD tag and let it sit. No one's going to delete the article without a loss of vote, and I don't see the votes coming. Geogre 21:12, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  - Keep. But I've replaced the VfD notice. It should only be removed if the vote is closed early~~, which seems appropriate in this case~~. I don't think there's any problem with the nominator doing this if there are no votes to delete outstanding. I do think there's a problem with having an article listed here but no VfD notice. Andrewa 05:51, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete Shard 05:53, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Comment: Why? Andrewa 06:26, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion