User talk:Itpastorn

Questions to me[edit]

Feel free to ask.

Comments to me[edit]

Feel free to speak your mind.

In your comment on the discussion page about the German spring offensive in WWI, you referred to a book that suggested that the German advance was slowed by looting for food and wine by the soldiers. FWIW, I recall reading that in Paul Fussell's The Great War and Modern Memory; perhaps that is the book you are thinking of??Bloggy's man 02:45, 25 January 2007 (UTC)Bloggy's Man[reply]

That's not the one, but it may say the same thing.

--itpastorn 15:45, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy, I uploaded the Acid3 Test screenshot with the current score of 52/100. Not sure how you wanted to link it up. MarsInSVG (talk) 17:39, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Acid3 ff20012 score52.png

I see that it has been taken care of. However the score of 52 seems unreliable. I get 51 with FFox 2.0.12 on Win XP.--itpastorn (talk) 18:01, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why the allies won WW2[edit]

In some articles this subject tend to come up. In some american movies, e.g. Pear Harbour, it seems as though the US won mainly because of their soldiers bravery, etc. In some discussions people seem to think that "if only" the Germans had won one more battle, be it Stalingrad, Kursk or "the Bulge" or whatever, they'd won the war. It is not true. It had simply prolonged the war some.

War material production in billions of dollars (dollar value as of 1944).[edit]

Source: P. Kennedy, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers (1966).

Country	1940	1941	1943
UK	3.5	6.5	11.1
Soviet	(5.0)	8.5	13.9
US	(0.5) sic!	4.5	37.5 sic!
Total allies	3.5 (France missing)	19.5	62.5
Germany	6.0	6.0	13.8
Japan	(1.0)	2.0	4.5
Italy	0.75	1.0	-
Axis total	6.75	9.0	18.3

--itpastorn 15:07, 2 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Translation!?[edit]

Can you help translate this for me to swedish? Many thanks in advance!

Albania is also rich in rivers and streams with significant hydroelectric potential. These have been exploited quite effectively, making the country an energy exporter. A number of huge hydroelectric power plants have been built, mainly on the Drin River, and more than half of the country's arable land is irrigated, largely from the artificial reservoirs created upstream of the dams.

--Armour 10:05, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Idiomatic translation:

Albanien har gott om floder och andra vattendrag med en påtaglig möjlighet att bygga vattenkraftverk. Dessa har exploaterats i stor utsträckning, så att landet exporterar el. Ett antal stora vattenkraftverk har byggts, främst på floden Drin, och mer än hälften av landets odlingsbara yta är konstbevattnad, till största delen från konstgjorda sjöar skapade genom kraftverkens fördämningar.

Re: Just curious[edit]

How a rather young person like you have come to study ancient greek to such an extent? And do you have any particular favourite works? --itpastorn 21:03, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I started relatively early and spent a good deal of my energy and life force learning the subject. Armed with a Greek dictionary and a grammar handbook in case of any abnormal features (ancient Greek prose and poetry display little-used irregular forms of verbs, etc) I can tackle the language pretty effectively. I have translated part of Aeschylus' Agamemnon and I am currently translating book I of the Iliad, part of which is required as a set text paper at Greek GCSE. They're both powerful works, and make a good, if rather heavy, read. In the case that I am unable to translate anything, I can cheat and consult the Greek thinktanks around this place - they're pretty knowledgable. haz _(user talk)^e 21:27, 5 March 2006

I can relate to that; we did large parts of the Ιλιάς and the Οδύσσεια in school, as well as various plays, historical authors, and so on. While I most certainly did not like my Latin/Ancient Greek teacher, he was great in his subjects. =] —Nightst a llion (?) 07:50, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania 2010 could be coming to Stockholm![edit]

I'm leaving you a note as you may be interested in this opportunity.

People from all six Nordic Wiki-communities (sv, no, nn, fi, da and is) are coordinating a bid for Wikimania 2010 in Stockholm. I'm sending you a message to let you know that this is occurring, and over the next few months we're looking for community support to make sure this happens! See the bid page on meta and if you like such an idea, please sign the "supporters" list at the bottom. Tack (or takk), and have a wonderful day! Mike H. Fierce! 09:05, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lord's Resistance Army[edit]

Do you recall which Swedish publications examine the Lord's Resistance Army? — C M B J 00:52, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The one which writes about it the most is probably [Dagen] --itpastorn (talk) 13:39, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Comparison of layout engines (Cascading Style Sheets)#Trident version numbers[edit]

Hello, Itpastorn. You have new messages at Talk:Comparison of layout engines (Cascading Style Sheets)#Trident version numbers.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

mabdul 02:15, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Comparison of layout engines (ECMAScript)[edit]

The article Comparison of layout engines (ECMAScript) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Inherently flawed article: JavaScript is not executed by a layout engine. Plus the data here is obsolete - no meaningful updates in at least 5 years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pmffl (talk) 01:39, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Itpastorn. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ethernet parameters[edit]

Template:Ethernet parameters has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:24, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Comparison of JavaScript engines[edit]

The article Comparison of JavaScript engines has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Current version of ECMAScript is 13. MSHTML and Presto are dead.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]