Talk:Ramayana

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:10, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox Image[edit]

A manuscript from the Mewar Rāmāyaṇa depicting Rāma slaying Rāvaṇa.

I believe this image would be better for the main infobox image than the one currently used. This image depicts a central event, the slaying of the principal antagonist Rāvaṇa by Rāma, the climax of the main narrative. It originates from a historic manuscript which depicts that the Rāmāyaṇa is a poem through the text. No other image on the page depicts manuscript text so far. This would also be inline with other epic pages's images, such as Mahabharata, Iliad, and Odyssey which depict their texual nature in the infobox image. Chariotrider555 (talk) 05:41, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declaration as Good article[edit]

This page meets all criteria for good article, how can it be promoted to good article Anand 12:26, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Aananda1 You can get more info here: Wikipedia:Good articlesDaxServer (t · m · c) 12:31, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusion of Raṅganātha in Ayōdhyā Kāṇḍa Section[edit]

I do not think it is appropriate to include mention of Raṅganātha in the Ayodhyā Kāṇḍa section. Firstly, there is no specific mention of Raṅga or Raṅganātha in the cited source ([1]). The cited lines state only that Rāma worshipped Nārāyaṇa in the Critical Edition of the Vālmīki Rāmāyaṇa. There is no mention of Raṅganātha, merely Nārāyaṇa.[2] Second, it is put in the main Rāmāyaṇa article's summary of the text's plot, and as such the summary should only contain the most critical pieces of information about the plot. The inclusion that Rāma worshipped Nārāyaṇa (or Raṅganātha, if it was mentioned so) as part of the pre-consencration rituals is unneccessary in a summary of the text. Pinging User:Narayanan Iyengar. Chariotrider555 (talk) 02:28, 3 September 2023 (UTC) Chariotrider555 (talk) 02:28, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously, Ranganatha is mentioned as an excuse to mention yet another temple. WP:COATRACK. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 03:48, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Valmiki Ramayana, Ayodhya kanda, sarga 6, sloka 1, 2 and 3
  2. ^ Pollock, Sheldon (1986). The Rāmāyaṇa of Vālmīki: An Epic of Ancient India, Volume II: Ayodhyakāṇḍa. Princeton University Press. p. 92.

Regarding the removal of some entries in popular culture[edit]

Can't we put a warning about missing sources instead of removing the entries? @Chariotrider555 Tusharhero (talk) 02:06, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tusharhero, No, it will forever remain like that otherwise. It is the WP:BURDEN of whoever adds something to the list to make sure it has its own page or academic sources beyond a trivial mention to prove notability. Chariotrider555 (talk) 02:20, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If written, what script was it when Valmiki wrote?[edit]

I am wondering that the script is definitely NOT Devanagiri. It may be in Brahmi or after Indus Scrip? Sarma Pisapati (talk) 19:35, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]